I believe it’s in the interest of quantum activism to delve into the “dark side” of why we need quantum activism in the first place; that dark side is the classicist, materialist-mechanistic paradigm that pervades every human endeavor, be it the structuring of society, institutions of education, culture, and religion, even “fringe” soft-sciences. Let’s flash some quantum light on these issues, and discuss the expedients of how we are to implement a quantum-based understanding in a world thoroughly imbued with the torpor of materialism.
Mark and Arek you totally ignored the core issues I wrote about. Here’s some advice for both of you, at least chat a little bit about the core issues someone else has brought up before you bombard them with what you think you know. You even got me off the subject. This post is about “Classical Mechanical Thinking” I gave a lot of incite to how we…[Read more]
The bottom line is you were not aware you were creating your own Universe, be warned, now you know. You can’t blame, love, god, spirits, satin or any other concepts, It’s on you and only you. If your Universe isn’t safe, you make it safer. If your not feeling love in your Universe, it’s because your not sending love out, You may think you are,…[Read more]
I just proved why this post is necessary on classical-mechanical thinking, I used the word “Universe” which is not accurate. You know Mark you are correct the word “Universe” is to broad. I can give you proof to support what you are saying. There is a great website, the address is http://www.spaceandmotion.com/ The title page is called “On truth…[Read more]
Mark you were wise to say, (In my view) because there is absolutely no proof that there are “only two components of the Universal system which is a steady state cycle.” There is absolutely no proof the “Universe will contract.” This is what scientist are saying, “no proof of Universal contraction yet.” There is absolutely no conclusive proof that…[Read more]
I like to look at core issues… The core issue is what does it take to ”feel safe” and ”feel loved?” If we can address this issue and put energy into solutions/mindsets then we have begun to see the light at the end of the tunnel. http://www.reallove.com
Since all that truly exists at the core of everything is only energy-consciousness, all e-motions must necessarily be only some kind of energy-in-motion (Energetic Vibrational Frequency).
The feeling of Love (the e-motion of Love), like all other feeling (which are our perception of energy-in-motion), must also be a particular frequency of that…[Read more]
1. In order to change or even shed light to materialistic-mechanistic thinking you must have a language or clear communicator that will not let materialistic concepts arise into the conversation. We are learning that our world is a giant illusionary holographically imprinted concept. We are trying to communicate oneness to a materialistic world…[Read more]
Ancient Upanishadic quantum theory:
Turiya is not that which is conscious of the inner (subjective) world, nor that which is conscious of the outer (objective) world, nor that which is conscious of both, nor that which is a mass of consciousness. It is not simple consciousness nor is It unconsciousness. It is unperceived, unrelated,…[Read more]
An aside, but for all who are interested in consciousness, do Google the term Vijnanavada and explore it. I suppose you can pinpoint its historical resurgence with Bohr, Heisenberg and the Copenhagen hermeneusis.
Another aside, but it is said that the deity of the Kasuga Mountain and Shrine in Japan was so impressed with Vijnanavada that he…[Read more]
I just done got back from LA; all’s quiet here on the quantum front. I suppose materialism has dissipated in this forum … now that’s a good thing!
Question for all to ponder: In the interest of quantum entanglement/superposition (which accords well with “nonduality”), is reality-as-such with respect to consciousness _dual_ in the…[Read more]